Euro 2004 Predictions: Handicapping Secrets Revealed
Why have we been so successful with our Euro 2004 plays? With multiple
winners each day of the tournament, it’s certainly not luck. We’ll share
some handicapping techniques that can make your Euro betting more
profitable.
Favourites: Don’t be afraid to bet favourites. Underdogs often get more
respect than they deserve in these tournaments, creating rare value in
the favourites. Unlike league games, where taking faves can be a risky
and losing strategy in the long term, big tournaments are friendly to
the favourites. Every game counts at Euro 2004, so teams tend to play at
their best. With fewer intervening factors, games become matchups of
skill where the more skilled team usually wins. You might think the 2002
World Cup was an exception because of the multitude of upsets. Korea
beat Italy and Spain, Senegal beat France and Sweden, USA beat Portugal,
and Denmark beat France. But many of those matches had “false
favourites” or teams better left alone. The opening game at Euro 2004
between Greece and Portugal was no different. Greece was the better
team, but we avoided betting against Portugal because of their home
advantage. Finding “false favourites” is a tricky but vital part of
successful handicapping.
Unbeaten situations: Tournaments like Euro 2004 are full of appealing
situations. For example, Bulgaria have not beaten Sweden since 1967.
Russia play poorly away from home and have never beaten Spain or
Portugal in games outside of Russia. These records are important
psychological factors for many teams. Knowing they’ve never beaten their
opponents, teams will come into a match lacking optimism. But since
results can go back more than a century and squads can change dramatically over a few years, it’s best not to rely
exclusively on
unbeaten situations when handicapping Euro 2004.
Travel: Unlike the domestic leagues, travel is a big factor in
international tournaments. It’s nearly 100 degrees in Portugal. Teams
from southern Europe can handle the conditions, but northerners are
severely disadvantaged. Remember, most national leagues don’t play in
the summer and many players are unaccustomed to hot weather soccer.
Playing so close to home, a team like Spain will be much more comfortable at Euro 2004 than, say, Denmark. The oddsmakers rarely
factor travel into their lines, so there’s lots of value there.
Style of play: Learn each team’s playing style. Are they defensive or
offensive minded? Will they play counterattack? Will they sit on a
one-goal lead or adjust their strategy after scoring? Teams will rarely
change their playing style because the best way to succeed is usually to
play their own game. Italy is famous for defensive soccer, while Sweden
and England have been known for their attacking style. Keep in mind,
however, that teams can occasionally change their playing styles. It’s
most common among weaker countries without deep rosters. Croatia, for
example, were a strong attacking team in 1998, but since the retirement
of several star players, a lack of talent has forced them to transform
into a defence-oriented squad.
Head-to-heads: A team’s playing style will either help or hurt their
opponents. Weak teams will often sit back and defend, knowing they have
little chance of scoring. If two teams with the same playing style meet
up, the more skilled team will usually win in a landslide. In a friendly
just before Euro 2004, for example, England thrashed Iceland 6-1 because
both teams played the same style. Looking at the head-to-head history
between teams can reveal useful situations. Sweden are 7-2-2 all time
against Bulgaria, for example, because Bulgaria’s playing style suits
the Swedes.
Over/Under situations: Every game counts at big tournaments. As a
result, teams are more careful and the Under becomes a more appealing
bet. The Under went 8-0 in all of Greece’s qualifying games and you can
be sure that will continue at Euro 2004. Look for over/under trends for
a team’s last few games. The scores can reveal a lot about a team’s
playing style and talent. Filter out results against minnows like San
Marino or Liechtenstein and you can establish true trends.
Roster changes: Teams only have 23 players to choose from so rosters and
injuries are crucial factors. Weaker countries have very little depth,
so there’s a big gap in quality between starting players and second
stringers. Of course, this isn’t a factor for countries with lots of
depth like France and Italy. We’ve spotted several key roster changes so
far that have seriously affected teams at Euro 2004. Russia and England
have serious injury problems on defence; Sweden’s attack has been
supercharged with the addition of Henrik Larsson to their lineup. With
players on several teams already suspended for multiple yellow cards,
roster changes will remain a key part of our handicapping for the rest
of this tournament.
|